In the 2006 film entitled "Idiocracy", a soldier is in a top-secret hibernation program ends up waking up in a future run by idiots. The premise was that, since the "smart people" spent their time working rather than having babies, the unintelligent masses ended up taking over society and government. But what would happen in these so called "smart people" actually did control the world? I think rather than in idiocracy, we would have a corruptocricy. A nation, and even a world, run by corrupt bureaucrats.
What would lead me to such a dystopian view of a future run by an elite intellectual class? Just take a look at Washington, D.C. and I think you'll agree that a corruptocricy is not such a far fetched idea after all. - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngelLIVE http://rdo.to/TALKLOUD
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE
@MalcolmOutLoud.
Who is in charge of your children? That has been a perennial question that has grown in importance over the last few years. When I was a child, it was understood that, with rare exceptions, parents were in charge of a child’s upbringing. This included medical, religious, and educational decisions. However, over the last few decades, the role of the parent in these decisions has been replaced by experts. What happens when the goal of the experts differs from those of the parents? Who decides the future of the rising generations? It was understood that the state acted in loco parentis, in place of the parents, only for the safety of the child. A recent case in U.S. District Court shows that be it health departments, child services, schools, or even the courts. Government not only believes they know better than the parents, they are more than willing to act in loco parentis tyrannis.
https://constitutionstudy.com/?p=8897
With the release of ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence (AI) applications, there has been a lot of speculation and downright assertions about our future. With over 30 years of experience in Information Technology (IT), not more than a passing understanding of AIs, I've come to the conclusion that much of what I've heard is more science fiction than fact. A recent court case decided in the D.C. District Court revolved around one very important question. Do AIs have rights?
In this third installment of the three-part series on the branches of government, we look at the role of the third and weakest branch. At least that is what our Founding Fathers thought of it. What is the role of the federal judiciary? What are the extent of their powers, how do they related to the other two branches of government, and why is a proper understanding of the role of the judiciary critical if the United States is to remain a constitutional republic?
https://constitutionstudy.com/?p=8575
Once again Congress is pushing through another Farm Bill, or as I like to call it, the One Big Beautiful Scam Bill. Let’s take a peek at what’s inside, and what other corrupt thievery is coming out of Washing, D.C. - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngel @OutLoudNews
LIVE http://rdo.to/TALKLOUD
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE
During an interview, Justice Thomas said “Americans need to take back our country”. I wholeheartedly agree. The question is, how? - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngel @OutLoudNews
LIVE http://rdo.to/TALKLOUD
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE
Listen to the rhetoric and you might think that democracy is the greatest thing man has ever created. But that is not what our Founding Fathers thought, and for very good reasons. - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngel @OutLoudNews
LIVE http://rdo.to/TALKLOUD
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE
