We like to think that an ‘effective’ government is one that does a great job preserving the liberty of its people, and providing them a legal framework under which they can prosper, but imagine two tyrannical dictators walking into a bar and discussing the ‘effectiveness’ of one another’s regimes. Would they discuss how free their people are, or would they have other metrics they use to determine what ‘effective’ means?
https://www.americaoutloud.com/governments-do-not-work-for-the-people-but-for-themselves/
Who is in charge of your children? That has been a perennial question that has grown in importance over the last few years. When I was a child, it was understood that, with rare exceptions, parents were in charge of a child’s upbringing. This included medical, religious, and educational decisions. However, over the last few decades, the role of the parent in these decisions has been replaced by experts. What happens when the goal of the experts differs from those of the parents? Who decides the future of the rising generations? It was understood that the state acted in loco parentis, in place of the parents, only for the safety of the child. A recent case in U.S. District Court shows that be it health departments, child services, schools, or even the courts. Government not only believes they know better than the parents, they are more than willing to act in loco parentis tyrannis.
https://constitutionstudy.com/?p=8897
With the release of ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence (AI) applications, there has been a lot of speculation and downright assertions about our future. With over 30 years of experience in Information Technology (IT), not more than a passing understanding of AIs, I've come to the conclusion that much of what I've heard is more science fiction than fact. A recent court case decided in the D.C. District Court revolved around one very important question. Do AIs have rights?
In this third installment of the three-part series on the branches of government, we look at the role of the third and weakest branch. At least that is what our Founding Fathers thought of it. What is the role of the federal judiciary? What are the extent of their powers, how do they related to the other two branches of government, and why is a proper understanding of the role of the judiciary critical if the United States is to remain a constitutional republic?
https://constitutionstudy.com/?p=8575
“A free nation once again…”. These bold words were spoken by Donald Trump at the World Economic Forum. Are they true? With all of the Executive Orders stopping censorship, CBDCs, and others, you may be thanking Mr. Trump. But it takes much more than an actively pro freedom President to make this nation free. - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngel @OutLoudNews
LIVE http://rdo.to/TALKLOUD
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE
We often talk about the abuses of the judicial branch of our governments, but every so often we see people doing the right thing. This time, it was a grand jury. So the next time you get that jury summons, don’t look at it as an imposition, but as an opportunity to establish justice where you live. - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngel @OutLoudNews
LIVE http://rdo.to/TALKLOUD
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE
Do you remember the line from the Declaration of independence,
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Are the states and the federal government protecting our right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngel @OutLoudNews
LIVE http://rdo.to/TALKLOUD
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE
