Emily Oster, Ph.D., Professor of Economics at Brown University, published an essay in the Atlantic magazine that stirred animus among students, parents, small business owners, patients, families, and healthcare workers who all found them on the wrong side of decisions made by public health officials.1 Oster, who has been critical of childhood and public masking in the past, has brought up for public consideration what should be done once all the decisions and harms are fully divulged.
In this issue of the Report, we dedicate time to reaction to this suggested quick move to amnesty for what many consider are crimes against humanity. To skip investigations and service of justice and move directly to amnesty seems premature to Fox News Laura Ingraham and many other commentators. We take a deep dive with medical ethics expert Dr. Russell Gonnering, MD, MBA.2 He helps us understand some obvious examples of tragic mistakes made from a medical ethics point of view.
https://www.americaoutloud.com/how-should-we-react-to-public-health-mistakes/
Who is in charge of your children? That has been a perennial question that has grown in importance over the last few years. When I was a child, it was understood that, with rare exceptions, parents were in charge of a child’s upbringing. This included medical, religious, and educational decisions. However, over the last few decades, the role of the parent in these decisions has been replaced by experts. What happens when the goal of the experts differs from those of the parents? Who decides the future of the rising generations? It was understood that the state acted in loco parentis, in place of the parents, only for the safety of the child. A recent case in U.S. District Court shows that be it health departments, child services, schools, or even the courts. Government not only believes they know better than the parents, they are more than willing to act in loco parentis tyrannis.
https://constitutionstudy.com/?p=8897
With the release of ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence (AI) applications, there has been a lot of speculation and downright assertions about our future. With over 30 years of experience in Information Technology (IT), not more than a passing understanding of AIs, I've come to the conclusion that much of what I've heard is more science fiction than fact. A recent court case decided in the D.C. District Court revolved around one very important question. Do AIs have rights?
In this third installment of the three-part series on the branches of government, we look at the role of the third and weakest branch. At least that is what our Founding Fathers thought of it. What is the role of the federal judiciary? What are the extent of their powers, how do they related to the other two branches of government, and why is a proper understanding of the role of the judiciary critical if the United States is to remain a constitutional republic?
https://constitutionstudy.com/?p=8575
I’ve seen government actors get things wrong. I’ve seen government actors make mistakes. But rarely have I seen government actors this certifiably crazy. - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngel @OutLoudNews
LIVE http://rdo.to/TALKLOUD
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE
I don’t care what idiots like Mayor Frey, Chuck Schumer, and others say, my prayers go out for the victims of the Annunciation School shooting, and theirs families. Because there is nothing else man can do in the face of such evil. Not just the evil of the twisted dude who shot up a school. But the evil of those who are once again using tragedy to promote a political agenda. - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngel @OutLoudNews
LIVE http://rdo.to/TALKLOUD
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE
The road the hell is paved with good intentions. Is that because we take our intentions and go too far with them? - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngel @OutLoudNews
LIVE http://rdo.to/TALKLOUD
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE
