When multiple people send me the same article asking me for comment, I assume it deals with a pretty big issue. That was the case with a recent article regarding negotiations between the Biden administration and the World Heath Organization. It’s not the agreement that grabbed my attention though, it is the fundamental misunderstanding of the Constitution and rule of law in the United States that is being exhibited by the administration, states, and yes the media. Before we get all twisted around the axel about the latest attempt by a President to trade American sovereignty and the people’s rights for their own aggrandizement, let’s learn what truly is legally binding within the republic. - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngel
LIVE http://rdo.to/TALKLOUD
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE
@MalcolmOutLoud.
Who is in charge of your children? That has been a perennial question that has grown in importance over the last few years. When I was a child, it was understood that, with rare exceptions, parents were in charge of a child’s upbringing. This included medical, religious, and educational decisions. However, over the last few decades, the role of the parent in these decisions has been replaced by experts. What happens when the goal of the experts differs from those of the parents? Who decides the future of the rising generations? It was understood that the state acted in loco parentis, in place of the parents, only for the safety of the child. A recent case in U.S. District Court shows that be it health departments, child services, schools, or even the courts. Government not only believes they know better than the parents, they are more than willing to act in loco parentis tyrannis.
https://constitutionstudy.com/?p=8897
With the release of ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence (AI) applications, there has been a lot of speculation and downright assertions about our future. With over 30 years of experience in Information Technology (IT), not more than a passing understanding of AIs, I've come to the conclusion that much of what I've heard is more science fiction than fact. A recent court case decided in the D.C. District Court revolved around one very important question. Do AIs have rights?
In this third installment of the three-part series on the branches of government, we look at the role of the third and weakest branch. At least that is what our Founding Fathers thought of it. What is the role of the federal judiciary? What are the extent of their powers, how do they related to the other two branches of government, and why is a proper understanding of the role of the judiciary critical if the United States is to remain a constitutional republic?
https://constitutionstudy.com/?p=8575
“hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.” I guess that is one reason why Susan Rice made the comments she did. But what she said seems much more like “payback is a …”. - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngel @OutLoudNews
LIVE https://buff.ly/w6h7Ul0
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE
While expected, the recently released SCOTUS decision about President Trump’s tariffs has led to a lot of agitation and arguments over the last few days. Let’s take a look at the decision and see what cooler heads can find. - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngel @OutLoudNews
LIVE https://buff.ly/w6h7Ul0
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE
In the Harry Potter books, there was a villain who shall not be named. Today it seems there is a truth so obvious a blind man can see it, but for some reason, it shall not be named when it counts. - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngel @OutLoudNews
LIVE https://buff.ly/w6h7Ul0
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE