Former college swimming champion Riley Gaines says she was ambushed and physically attacked by pro-transgender protesters, forcing her to remain barricaded in a classroom for nearly three hours, after she gave a talk on saving women’s sports at San Francisco State University (SFSU) Thursday.
Gaines, a 12-time All-American swimmer at the University of Kentucky, became a national spokeswoman against the inclusion of biological males in women’s sports after she was forced to compete against — and share a locker room with — the University of Pennsylvania’s William “Lia” Thomas. Gaines and Thomas tied in one race, but the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) decided the trophy would go to Thomas “simply because they want Thomas to be holding the trophy in all the photos,” reported the Washington Examiner.
Who is in charge of your children? That has been a perennial question that has grown in importance over the last few years. When I was a child, it was understood that, with rare exceptions, parents were in charge of a child’s upbringing. This included medical, religious, and educational decisions. However, over the last few decades, the role of the parent in these decisions has been replaced by experts. What happens when the goal of the experts differs from those of the parents? Who decides the future of the rising generations? It was understood that the state acted in loco parentis, in place of the parents, only for the safety of the child. A recent case in U.S. District Court shows that be it health departments, child services, schools, or even the courts. Government not only believes they know better than the parents, they are more than willing to act in loco parentis tyrannis.
https://constitutionstudy.com/?p=8897
With the release of ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence (AI) applications, there has been a lot of speculation and downright assertions about our future. With over 30 years of experience in Information Technology (IT), not more than a passing understanding of AIs, I've come to the conclusion that much of what I've heard is more science fiction than fact. A recent court case decided in the D.C. District Court revolved around one very important question. Do AIs have rights?
In this third installment of the three-part series on the branches of government, we look at the role of the third and weakest branch. At least that is what our Founding Fathers thought of it. What is the role of the federal judiciary? What are the extent of their powers, how do they related to the other two branches of government, and why is a proper understanding of the role of the judiciary critical if the United States is to remain a constitutional republic?
https://constitutionstudy.com/?p=8575
If you’ve ever watched, or even heard about the move “Network”, you’ve probably heard the famous line “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take this anymore!” Some recent news points to some people being mad as hell, but will they continue to take it? - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngel @OutLoudNews
LIVE https://buff.ly/hITK1rt
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE
Copyrights and patents are important protections for inventors, authors, and all sorts of creators. In the case Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment, I'm reminded of the response Willie Sutton gave when asked why he robbed banks. "Because that's where the money is." Because this case seems more like a copyright shakedown than the protection of copyrights.
America is supposed to be a nation of laws, not of men. More and more people act as if the law doesn’t matter, often by claiming a right that just isn’t a right. What should We the People do about this? - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngel @OutLoudNews
LIVE https://buff.ly/hITK1rt
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE
