Former college swimming champion Riley Gaines says she was ambushed and physically attacked by pro-transgender protesters, forcing her to remain barricaded in a classroom for nearly three hours, after she gave a talk on saving women’s sports at San Francisco State University (SFSU) Thursday.
Gaines, a 12-time All-American swimmer at the University of Kentucky, became a national spokeswoman against the inclusion of biological males in women’s sports after she was forced to compete against — and share a locker room with — the University of Pennsylvania’s William “Lia” Thomas. Gaines and Thomas tied in one race, but the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) decided the trophy would go to Thomas “simply because they want Thomas to be holding the trophy in all the photos,” reported the Washington Examiner.
Who is in charge of your children? That has been a perennial question that has grown in importance over the last few years. When I was a child, it was understood that, with rare exceptions, parents were in charge of a child’s upbringing. This included medical, religious, and educational decisions. However, over the last few decades, the role of the parent in these decisions has been replaced by experts. What happens when the goal of the experts differs from those of the parents? Who decides the future of the rising generations? It was understood that the state acted in loco parentis, in place of the parents, only for the safety of the child. A recent case in U.S. District Court shows that be it health departments, child services, schools, or even the courts. Government not only believes they know better than the parents, they are more than willing to act in loco parentis tyrannis.
https://constitutionstudy.com/?p=8897
With the release of ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence (AI) applications, there has been a lot of speculation and downright assertions about our future. With over 30 years of experience in Information Technology (IT), not more than a passing understanding of AIs, I've come to the conclusion that much of what I've heard is more science fiction than fact. A recent court case decided in the D.C. District Court revolved around one very important question. Do AIs have rights?
In this third installment of the three-part series on the branches of government, we look at the role of the third and weakest branch. At least that is what our Founding Fathers thought of it. What is the role of the federal judiciary? What are the extent of their powers, how do they related to the other two branches of government, and why is a proper understanding of the role of the judiciary critical if the United States is to remain a constitutional republic?
https://constitutionstudy.com/?p=8575
During the campaign media personnel and pundits alike “warned” that, if he won the election, Trump would become a dictator. Looking at some recent “news” articles might even give someone the impression that the warning was coming true. Which is why we need to take a closer look, especially at the original documents, to see if this is true. - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngel @OutLoudNews
LIVE http://rdo.to/TALKLOUD
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE
We’ve all seen someone who just looses the plot of the story. Maybe it’s just a relative who misquotes a parable, often with humorous results. But what happens when the person missing the plot is a government actors, and it’s not a parable, but the Constitution of the United States that they've got wrong? - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngel @OutLoudNews
LIVE http://rdo.to/TALKLOUD
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE
If you’ve followed the news out of Washington, D.C. lately, you could almost forget there are three branches of government. That is how focused the media has been on the fight between the President and the federal judiciary. Have you ever considered what you can do about “rogue” judges? - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngel @OutLoudNews
LIVE http://rdo.to/TALKLOUD
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE
