Do you know who said?
“The education of all children, from the moment that they can get along without a mother's care, shall be in state institutions.”
If you said Karl Marx, you’d be correct. If you said that Gavin Newsom may not have said it, but his actions suggest he believes it, well you’d also be correct. And if you suggested that Governor Newsom was not the only government actor out for your children, then you got three out of three!
What can you say about a government that wants to turn children into sex objects? What about those in government who seem to be doing all they can to allow, if not promote, the killing of children? That are not only willing to effectively take children away from their parents, but believe that those children exist to serve the state? There was a many who thought like that. His name was Aldo Hitler, who said in 1933:
“If the older generation can not get accustomed to us, we shall take their children away from them and rear them as needful to the Fatherland.”
When your state looks more like Nazi Germany than the United States, you shouldn’t be surprised when people flee, as they did from East Germany. Many who might not leave to same themselves, will do so to save their children.
Is it any wonder people are concerned for the future of this country, when so many government actors look and sound more like Karl Marx and Adolf Hitler than George Washington?
Who is in charge of your children? That has been a perennial question that has grown in importance over the last few years. When I was a child, it was understood that, with rare exceptions, parents were in charge of a child’s upbringing. This included medical, religious, and educational decisions. However, over the last few decades, the role of the parent in these decisions has been replaced by experts. What happens when the goal of the experts differs from those of the parents? Who decides the future of the rising generations? It was understood that the state acted in loco parentis, in place of the parents, only for the safety of the child. A recent case in U.S. District Court shows that be it health departments, child services, schools, or even the courts. Government not only believes they know better than the parents, they are more than willing to act in loco parentis tyrannis.
https://constitutionstudy.com/?p=8897
With the release of ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence (AI) applications, there has been a lot of speculation and downright assertions about our future. With over 30 years of experience in Information Technology (IT), not more than a passing understanding of AIs, I've come to the conclusion that much of what I've heard is more science fiction than fact. A recent court case decided in the D.C. District Court revolved around one very important question. Do AIs have rights?
In this third installment of the three-part series on the branches of government, we look at the role of the third and weakest branch. At least that is what our Founding Fathers thought of it. What is the role of the federal judiciary? What are the extent of their powers, how do they related to the other two branches of government, and why is a proper understanding of the role of the judiciary critical if the United States is to remain a constitutional republic?
https://constitutionstudy.com/?p=8575
How many of you realize that civics isn’t taught in our schools today. Even in law schools, the Constitution, the supreme law of the land, is not taught. How can America be a constitutional republic when no one knows what the Constitution actually says? - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngel @OutLoudNews
LIVE http://rdo.to/TALKLOUD
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE
Some people claim that the First Amendment is first because it’s of first importance. But is that true? And is the Second Amendment really there to protect the first, as some people say? Let’s take a closer look at these common statements. - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngel @OutLoudNews
LIVE http://rdo.to/TALKLOUD
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE
Back in June I wrote about the oral arguments in Mexico's law suit against American gun manufacturers and distributors. While the court overall came to the expected decision, I think it's still worth some time digging into the logic and reasoning of the justices.
https://constitutionstudy.com/2025/10/10/497-decision-on-mexicos-gun-suit/
