Every year, around the end of June, the Supreme Court of the United States releases a flurry of opinions. Most of these are either extremely important opinions, or just controversial ones. For this reason, I call this time, “SCOTUS Silly Season”. While I’ve already covered such controversies as government coercion of social media companies, presidential immunity, and attempts to use the Fourteenth Amendment to keep Trump off the ballot, there are plenty more. Today we’ll look at the opinions involving Administrative Law Judges, the cost of convictions, and abortion. - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngel @OutLoudNews
LIVE http://rdo.to/TALKLOUD
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE
Who is in charge of your children? That has been a perennial question that has grown in importance over the last few years. When I was a child, it was understood that, with rare exceptions, parents were in charge of a child’s upbringing. This included medical, religious, and educational decisions. However, over the last few decades, the role of the parent in these decisions has been replaced by experts. What happens when the goal of the experts differs from those of the parents? Who decides the future of the rising generations? It was understood that the state acted in loco parentis, in place of the parents, only for the safety of the child. A recent case in U.S. District Court shows that be it health departments, child services, schools, or even the courts. Government not only believes they know better than the parents, they are more than willing to act in loco parentis tyrannis.
https://constitutionstudy.com/?p=8897
With the release of ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence (AI) applications, there has been a lot of speculation and downright assertions about our future. With over 30 years of experience in Information Technology (IT), not more than a passing understanding of AIs, I've come to the conclusion that much of what I've heard is more science fiction than fact. A recent court case decided in the D.C. District Court revolved around one very important question. Do AIs have rights?
In this third installment of the three-part series on the branches of government, we look at the role of the third and weakest branch. At least that is what our Founding Fathers thought of it. What is the role of the federal judiciary? What are the extent of their powers, how do they related to the other two branches of government, and why is a proper understanding of the role of the judiciary critical if the United States is to remain a constitutional republic?
https://constitutionstudy.com/?p=8575
We were told that pride was something to be avoided. Jesus listed pride among the evils that come out of a man. Yet we just completed an entire month dedicated to pride. Not pride in an accomplishment or some historical event, but pride in perversity. It was more than just the half-naked and phonographic parades, but the extortion used to get people and companies to join in. As Proverbs says: “Pride goes before destruction, And a haughty spirit before a fall.” It seems that the Pride Mafia may have led to a fall. - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngel @OutLoudNews
LIVE http://rdo.to/TALKLOUD
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE
Two hundred and forty eight years ago, things looked bleak for the colonies in 1776. The question of freedom had life and death consequences. Those 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence knew they were committing treason against their king. They knew that freedom would cost them greatly. Yet they still pledged to each other their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor. Today, groups of people around this nation are still fighting for their independence. Not from political affiliation, but from ever expanding governments dedicated to taking away our independence, our freedom, and our right to life, liberty, and to pursue happiness. Will you stand by while your birthright as an American is taken away from you and your family? Will you join with others to make sure this remains the land of the free by once again becoming the home of the brave? Will you pledge your life, your fortune, and your sacred honor, not to me or to this nation, but to your children and those who will follow? As we ...
The First Amendment helps protect your right to petition the government for a redress of grievance. We seem to forget that when we sue we’re asking a government entity, the courts, for redress. The fact is, the people deciding the case are human, and therefore prone to mistakes, which means they’re not always going to get things right. And we can’t forget that some of those people are going to have an agenda which clouds their judgement. The Supreme Court gave us what appears to be a perfect example in their decision in the Murthy v. Missouri case. - Live 4PM ET with Host Paul Engel @CyberEngel @OutLoudNews
LIVE http://rdo.to/TALKLOUD
iHEART RADIO http://bit.ly/2mBrCxE